Back to School

Those are the sample testimonies of students who have gone to military schools before, knowing that military prep schools integrate academic and fitness education under the supervision of the school’s professional instructors. Parents who wanted to enroll their child in this institution ought to have the precise awareness about the physical activities. The rigor of this doings is only advisable for students in a good health. Subsequently, it is also within the parents’ responsibility to check their child’s health before sending them to military institutions.

It is already evident how military schools consistently reaching the highest level of providing education, because of their standard and high quality contribution for leadership and competent education; and since physical fitness is important to develop in a military aspirant, the training that includes sports and exercises which is actually beneficial.

Recently, there has been lots of discussion in the U.S. concerning about the meaningful advantages of physical activity for young people; to the fact that diabetes, obesity, and high blood pressure is increasing in rate due to their poor discipline of eating habits and regular exercise. Consequently, chiefly the military boarding school, the physical fitness programs put into practice is considered to be a beneficial change.

And this is why more and more parents are getting interested to send their child to these types of schools, most especially to those who dreamt of entering armed forces. The Military prep schools are mainly the best ground to start gaining about military lifestyle and responsibilities. These schools are only the educational setting that can afford to make everyone interested step on the ladder and clasp the key of the door to armed forces career. On the other hand, recognize the valuable upshot of Physical Fitness Program in military schools:

• As a part of the routine in military institutions, in particular to military boarding school where students are required to live and stay inside the school premises, their daily life includes daily exercise that they might learn to accept it and even make their habit.
• An exercise helps increase the stamina, builds up muscles, and reduces stress.
• Healthy exercising boost energy which is required to pursue goals in life successfully.
• A physical fitness through sports can build up sportsmanship and team leadership of student attitude.
• Physical fitness can keep a student in good physical shape to lessen their body fat.
• Can be the way to motivate them coping up their studies and socializing with peers healthily.

In a military boarding school physical fitness and sports programs, the students body will eventually be used to be ready to excel. They will be familiarized at working out in a different ways that can make their military career much easier.

Have you ever considered your children going to girls military schools? Such option may not be the primary choice especially when your child is a girl. But if you look beyond the feminine side of your daughter, things are really going to be different when she, from a dependent, immature, and irresponsible girl, grows up to be a matured and independent woman.

Your daughter must have been used to doing things yours or her way. She must have been growing up to be given with what she wanted, probably became spoiled. When she get to a military school, surely, she will have a different life.

If your daughter is used to become lazy and happy-go-lucky, in a military school, such attitude is not tolerable. She will have no room for idleness. The school will really push her to her limitations and release the kind of accountable and academically inclined attitude. Besides, with the kind of training and teaching she will encounter inside the school, she will be free from any drug or gang temptations, promiscuous behaviors, and extreme peer pressures. In fact, with the kind of life she will live as she stays inside the campus, she will become academically excellent.

Your daughter must have had a potential of an excellent leader and become a successful person in the future. With the proper training and development she will encounter in our military school, such potential will surely get untapped. Each lesson and activity she will live out from day to day is a stepping stone towards her personal success; thus become a better person. Many people have posted their testimonials and praise reports as to how they used to become too passive, dependent, and mischievous. But when they decided to go to military schools, especially those who had gone to military schools for boys in Texas, their old and rotten attitude melted and they developed a kind of attitude they and their parents will certainly be proud of.

So don’t hesitate to let your daughter—or even your son if you have one—to enrol to a military school. Look for options and various selections in our site if you are interested.

Military schools are honestly the best place for a student would take especially when they aim excellence and responsibility development. Why? It’s because of these six basic facts. Enjoy!

Fact #1: There are only a few schools

According to About.com, there are approximately 45 military schools in the United States. Compared to the other number of schools in the US, there are only a few percentages for these military schools. Most are actually elementary military school that operates on grade 9 to 12. Some are junior high. As for others, there are also residential schools considered as military school.

Fact #2: Military schools implement discipline

Discipline is actually the most core value among military, and this is actually the first word we could think of when it comes to these schools. Yes, it’s discipline because this moral creates order, and order creates results. When a person is disciplined, it is expected that his life will be transformed.

Fact #3: They build character

One of the distinctive traits a military school possesses is that it really builds character. Some schools may teach their students the academic traits only, but a military school will always equip the students not just their minds but also their hearts and character as well.

Fact #4: They are selective

The truth is, not everybody can get to a military school. These institutions have their own individual admission requirements. Usually, the school is looking for youngsters who want to succeed in life.

Fact #5: Their graduates are distinctive

Since the school has extremely high standards, it is an expectation that their graduates are distinguished as well. Their training is honestly not that easy, that’s why when they graduate, and they graduate to be completely equipped with knowledge, maturity, and responsibility.

Fact #6: They develop leaders

“Developing leaders is at the core of a military schools philosophy”. Their role of training students has been their objective from the beginning. Moreover, they recognize the potential of each of their students who particularly have leadership skills; therefore they will try with all their methods into unfolding the latent a person can possess.

Some 45 per cent of schools inspected by Ofsted in the last eight months were ranked no better than “satisfactory”, it was disclosed.

More than one-in-20 primary or secondary schools were declared inadequate – the watchdog’s lowest possible rating.

Ofsted insisted the figures were skewed by a new hard-line inspection regime – implemented for the first time in 2009 – which focuses more attention on weak schools and places a greater emphasis on classroom teaching and pupils’ results.

But the disclosure will fuel fresh fears that school standards are still not good enough after 13 years of a Labour government.

It cames as Michael Gove, the Education Secretary, was due to use a speech in Birmingham on Thursday to criticise the “low expectations culture” in some schools.

He will say that Britain risks losing ground to rapidly-developing economies in Asia unless the pace of improvement in the education system is accelerated.

In an attempt to wipe out failing schools, the Coalition will set a tough new exam target for every state secondary to meet by 2015. Within four years, all schools should ensure at least half of pupils finish compulsory education with five A* to C grade GCSEs, including the key subjects of English and maths.

Currently, almost a third of England 3,100 secondary schools fall below the benchmark. They could be closed or turned into independent academies under the leadership of a third-party sponsor if they fail to improve.

But Christine Gilbert, Ofsted’s chief inspector, suggested many were making good progress.

“Ofsted’s current school inspection arrangements set out to be more challenging to schools, so it is encouraging to see 54 per cent were judged good or outstanding,” she said. “Greater involvement of head teachers and senior staff in the inspection process is helping schools better understand areas for development and action.”

Ofsted’s latest figures chart standards at schools inspected between September 2010 and April this year – the autumn and spring terms.

According to figures, 39 per cent of schools were satisfactory and six per cent were inadequate – the bottom two rankings on a four-point scale.

Some 44 per cent of schools were good and 10 per cent were outstanding.

Comparable figures from last year showed 13 per cent of schools were outstanding, 43 per cent were good, 37 per cent were satisfactory and eight per cent were inadequate.

In 2008/9 – before Ofsted’s tough inspection regime was introduced – just 32 per cent of schools were placed in the bottom two categories compared with 45 per cent currently.

As many as 100 state schools are to be constructed under PFI because of a lack of spare cash during the public spending squeeze.

It is believed the move will allow ministers to make scarce resources available for flagship programmes such as the expansion of parent-run “free schools”.

But the move was criticised by teachers who said it would prove hugely expensive in the long-term and limit heads’ powers to run their own schools.

It also risks leaving the Government open to claims of hypocrisy after the Tories branded PFI a “totally discredited” system while in Opposition.

Under PFIs, companies are brought in to fund and build public services such as hospitals and schools. The taxpayer avoids upfront costs but is locked into expensive long-term repayment deals.

Related Articles

• School building PFIs will cost taxpayer billions

  09 Aug 2007

• Ex-head of PFI school attacks ‘money-wasting’

  18 Aug 2006

• PFI: £70m bill for schools that had to close

  26 Jan 2011

• Must we sack teachers to pay for £320 plug sockets?

  25 Jan 2011

• Gordon Brown’s poisoned PFI legacy

  24 Jan 2011

• ‘Force firms to repay ghastly PFI profits’

  29 Jan 2011

Companies can often charge huge mark-ups for basic maintenance and councils face shelling out millions in compensation if schools close before the contract expires.

Last year, the Department for Education’s budget for school buildings was slashed by 60 per cent in the comprehensive spending review.

The Government also axed Labour’s £55bn programme to rebuild or refurbish every secondary school in England, although a small number of construction projects will still go ahead.

According to reports, the Treasury is now considering using PFI to complete the first 100 of these new schools.

“There is a massive need for capital investment at the moment, and if 100 schools can be built using PFI then you are creating additional money – freeing up resources – to fund free schools,” a source told the Times Educational Supplement.

But teachers criticised the use of PFI. Under the system, schools remain in private hands and heads often have to pay charges to use buildings at the evening and weekends.

Brian Lightman, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “A lot of PFI schools left massive bills for schools and local authorities. Although it avoids the need to put money up front, in the long term this system is far more expensive.”

Earlier this year, it emerged that a PFI school that was opened to great fanfare in 2009 by Ed Balls, the former Labour education secretary, is to close this summer.

The school – Christ the King in Huyton, Merseyside – cost £24m to build and the local taxpayer is likely to spend the next 23 years paying off the debt.

A Treasury spokesman: “HM Treasury has changed the rules for PFIs. No decision on funding has been made in this case.”